|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - April 23 - April 24, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Roberson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 1 CA-CV 00-0555,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, April 23, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where pharmacist refused to sign behavior improvement plan, manager fired pharmacist, and pharmacist sued store and manager for breach of an employment contract, pharmacist was at-will employee and court erred by denying store's motions for JMOL.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Walk v. Ring, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0090-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 24, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Questions of discovery, and resulting accrual, were for jury, and supreme court declined to adopt rule that, in every case, required patient who suffered an adverse result to question her doctors or lawyers about possibility of negligence.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|