 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Nguyen, 1 CA-CR 03-0606, 1 CA-CR 03-0607 (consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Potential sentence for defendant's previously adjudicated offense was properly excluded when determining whether a 12-person jury was required for defendant's trial for a burglary committed while on probation for the prior crime.
|
|||||
| Clark v. New Magma Irrigation & Drainage Dist., 2 CA-CV 2003-0026,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, June 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an irrigation district only held an easement on property for the purpose of maintaining canal for federal government, court properly held that it was not liable to parents whose son was killed when his motorcycle ran into fence on property.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Clay, 1 CA-CV 03-0384,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, June 24, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother received a large Social Security check for her child based on father's disability, check was not to be treated as arrearage payment or future payment and, therefore, did not result in support overpayment requiring a refund to the father.
|
|||||
| Crackel v. Allstate Ins. Co., 2 CA-CV 2002-0123,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, June 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an abuse of process case, plaintiffs showed they had been injured as a result of defendants abuse of process where defendant did not participate in settlement in good faith, and plaintiffs eventually waived sanctions because they were "worn out."
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
