 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Commitment of Conn, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-04-0116-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Long v. City of Glendale, 1 CA-CV 03-0051,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, June 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Suit based on terms in deed that required City to build a runway was not barred by public entity accrual statute, as claim accrued when plaintiff "realized" damage, but permissive parol evidence rule could not be used to change meaning of deed terms.
|
|||||
| OConnor v. Hyatt, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-04-0126-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Phelps v. Firebird Raceway, Inc., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-04-0114-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Phillips v. Araneta, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-03-0351-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse discretion in requiring defendant to submit to examination, where defendant indicated he would raise mental state as mitigating factor in murder trial, but order did not adequately protect self-incrimination privilege.
|
|||||
| Stanley v. McCarver, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-03-0099-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Physician, for consideration, interpreted a nurse's pre-employment x-ray, which showed abnormalities. Nurse was later diagnosed with cancer. Physician owed a duty of care to nurse, despite lack of patient-physician relationship.
|
|||||
| State v. Brown, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-04-0108-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Dewakuku, 1 CA-CR 03-0280,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, June 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Determination of defendant's release status for sentencing purposes should have been done by a jury, not a judge. Also, defendant's admission that he was on release at time of assault was not knowing and voluntary.
|
|||||
| State v. Reinhardt, 1 CA-CR 02-1003PR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, June 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in finding that defendant's three personal drug possession convictions constituted two strikes for sentencing purposes because they occurred on the same occasion. Thus, the convictions should have been considered as one strike.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
