 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Supreme Court v. Stewart, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-00-0150-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 27, 2001, Decided , April 27, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bils v. Bils, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0463-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendants, as defendants' underlying conduct occurred out-of-state, defendants did not aim anything at Arizona, and the only connection Arizona had to the case was plaintiff's residency.
|
|||||
| In re Cord, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0042,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 2, 2001, Decided , May 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's misuse of trust account was one continuing offense based on lack of experience. Suspension was proper since mitigating factors outweighed aggravating ones.
|
|||||
| In re Edson, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0072-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 2, 2001, Decided , May 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The attorney was disbarred for failure to pay another attorney his share of the fees, delaying a case, overdrawing his trust account several times, and failing to cooperate with the state bar during its investigation.
|
|||||
| In re Estrada, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0073-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 2, 2001, Decided , May 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was disbarred based on his failure to respond to allegations against him, existence of several aggravating circumstances and one mitigating circumstance, as well as the severity of injuries suffered by his clients.
|
|||||
| Dahir v. John C. Lincoln Hosp., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-00-0419-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 3, 2001, Decided , May 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State Dep't of Econ. Sec. v. Leonardo, 2 CA-SA 01-0023,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge erred as a matter of law in finding that the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children was inapplicable to the out-of-state placement of children with the noncustodial out-of-state parent.
|
|||||
| State v. Bocharski, Supreme Court No. CR-97-0306-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Drifter's death sentence was set aside where trial court abused discretion in accepting his waiver of mitigation investigation and might also have improperly considered victim impact evidence in passing sentence.
|
|||||
| State v. Miranda, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0540-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 4, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions were proper where, because the jury could have found that he did not commit aggravated assault but did commit disorderly conduct, the judge's instruction on aggravated assault was not erroneous.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
