 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| DOUGLAS AUTO & EQUIP. v. INDUSTRIAL COMM'N OF ARIZONA, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0239-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, April 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employee had no way of immediately knowing that a compensable injury occurred to his knee, that provided sufficient basis for excusing him from complying with statutory forthwith reporting requirement.
|
|||||
| Shannon v. Computer Assocs. Int'l, 1 CA-CV 01-0321,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, April 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee, who choose to become an independent contractor, was not entitled to any back pay for a WARN Act violation where employer announced mass layoffs the day before he became an independent contractor; he planned his own termination.
|
|||||
| In re Bayless, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-02-0038-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 1, 2002, Decided , May 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 30 days with 2 years of probation when he failed to properly represent client in lawsuit when, inter alia, attorney failed to provide adequate discovery and did not communicate settlement offers to client.
|
|||||
| In re Klahr, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-02-0036-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 1, 2002, Decided , May 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Suspended attorney was disbarred, as, inter alia, he did not supervise the work of attorneys he hired on contract, and, over prolonged period, he allowed unqualified and dangerous persons to manage and actively participate in his law practice.
|
|||||
| In re Weinert-Landrith, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-02-0024-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 1, 2002, Decided , May 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended from practice for six months for overdrawing her client trust accounts and failing to timely respond to the state bar's inquiry about the overdrafts, thereby causing injury or potential injury to clients and the public.
|
|||||
| State v. Gibson, Supreme Court No. CR 01-0045-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where third-party culpability evidence created reasonable doubt as to the defendant's guilt, and was not unduly prejudicial to the State, trial court's denial to admit the evidence was error, and the defendant was entitled to a new trial.
|
|||||
| In re Bemis, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0083-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 7, 2002, Decided , May 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was censured and placed on probation for one year, where he failed to satisfy sanctions imposed on him by the court for filing an improper motion to modify a child support order and failed to diligently represent another client.
|
|||||
| Scottsdale Healthcare, Inc. v. Ariz. Health Care Cost Containment Sys. Admin., 1 CA-CV 01-0226,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in concluding that an illegal alien's rehabilitation-related care was necessary to treat an emergency medical condition and in requiring a State agency to reimburse a healthcare provider for that care.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
