 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Salt River Pima - Maricopa Indian Cmty. Sch. v. State, 1 CA-CV 99-0549, 1 CA-CV 00-0225, (CONSOLIDATED),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 8, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Challenge to charter school funding statute by schools funded by Bureau of Indian Affairs that had converted to charter schools and the schools' students did not raise equal protection violations.
|
|||||
| In re Strass, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0098-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 9, 2001, Decided , May 9, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's numerous ethical violations, including allowing double payment of attorney's fees and failure to keep trust account records, resulted in censure, probation for one year, payment of restitution, and payment of costs of proceedings.
|
|||||
| City of Tucson v. Grezaffi, 2 CA-CV 00-0172,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, May 10, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City ordinance prohibiting restaurant owners from allowing smoking in restaurants except in designated areas was facially valid and rationally related to the legitimate governmental interest of safeguarding health of community.
|
|||||
| In re Rose, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0097-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 11, 2001, Decided , May 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Scholl, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0085-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 11, 2001, Decided , May 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Levenson, Comm. No. 01-0865,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 14, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Decker, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0099-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 16, 2001, Decided , May 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was censured and ordered to participate in supervised probation program after making inaccurate but good faith interpretations of the law, and failing to provide accurate and timely billing statements to clients.
|
|||||
| State v. Trani, 2 CA-CR 00-0091,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court improperly dismissed murder indictment due to prosecutorial misconduct because prosecutor did not act intentionally, knowing his conduct to be improper, and in pursuit of improper purpose without regard to possibility of causing mistrial.
|
|||||
| State Dep't of Revenue v. Canyoneers, Inc., 1 CA-TX 00-0016, 1 CA-TX 00-0017, 1 CA-TX 00-0018, 1 CA-TX 00-0019, (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, May 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Department of revenue was not authorized to condition refund of sums remitted as transaction privilege taxes on an activity that later was found not taxable on taxpayer's agreement to pass refunds on to customers.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
