|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - May 30 - June 14, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. O'Dell, 2 CA-CR 2001-0031, 2 CA-CR 2001-0163, 2 CA-CR 2001-0164, 2 CA-CR 2001-0166, 2 CA-CR 2001-0167, 2 CA-CR 2001-0168, 2 CA-CR 2001-0169, 2 CA-CR 2001-0177, 2 CA-CR 2001-0190 (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court erred dismissing DUI charges and driving with blood alcohol content of 0.10 percent or more because State failed to preserve intoxilyzer data, that no longer existed; there had been no prior discovery order State failed to comply with.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re Miranda, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0090-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 10, 2002, Decided , June 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Because an attorney failed to disclose an issue in connection with the state bar's grievance investigation, the attorney was held to have violated the ethical rules, and she was censured and placed on probation.
|
|
| |
In re Mettler, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0094-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 14, 2002, Decided , June 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was censured and placed on probation for two years where, inter alia, he did not fully cooperate with opposing counsel pursuant to a court order which resulted in taxable costs in the amount of $ 6,445 being assessed against his clients.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback