 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Andress v. City of Chandler, 1 CA-CV 99-0443,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, June 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Notice of claim time-period was not tolled during the mandatory arbitration of personal injury suit against city; tolling only applied where alternative dispute procedures had to be exhausted prior to filing a complaint.
|
|||||
| C.B. v. Sabalos, 2 CA-SA 00-0048, 2 CA-SA 00-0049, 2 CA-SA 00-0053, (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, June 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The nature of mental health records encroached on the protection of the patients' privacy because of the likelihood that production of the records would lead to identification of the non-party patients.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Romley v. Sheldon, 1 CA-SA 00-0103,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, June 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order denying request for deposition in action to detain party as sexually violent person was reversed; action was civil, subject to civil deposition rules, and deposition was not barred by privilege against self-incrimination.
|
|||||
| State v. Jones, 1 CA-SA 00-0039,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, June 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Preliminary hearing's purpose was to determine whether probable cause existed to hold defendant on alleged charges and not to decide guilt or innocence, so the prosecution was not required to establish the corpus delicti in preliminary hearing.
|
|||||
| In re Paul M., 2 CA-JV 99-0064,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, June 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Adjudication finding minor delinquent for knowingly abusing a school employee was vacated, where minor, although he used vulgarity, did not attack, injure, disparage, revile, or denounce the employee personally.
|
|||||
| Milner v. Colonial Trust Co., 1 CA-CV 99-0512,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, June 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a bill of sale should have accompanied livestock transfer, its absence did not void the gift to appellant. Since appellee's intent to gift the horse remained in dispute, granting summary judgment was improper.
|
|||||
| State v. Anderson, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0294-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A death sentence was reversed because the trial court committed structural error by excluding prospective jurors who had only general objections to the death penalty.
|
|||||
| State v. French, 2 CA-CR 99-0304-PR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, June 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's second petition for post-conviction relief was properly denied, where his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel could have been raised in his first post-conviction relief petition.
|
|||||
| State v. Jones, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0537-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 15, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On direct appeal, appellant's death sentence was affirmed; prosecutorial remark regarding the death sentence was not reversible error and appellant failed to prove sufficient mitigating factors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
