 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Camelback Plaza Dev. v. Hard Rock Cafe Int'l, Inc., 1 CA-CV 00-0516,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, May 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney fee award in a commercial forcible detainer action was reversed because the trial court was not authorized to award attorney fees as "charges" or "rent" under the provisions of the statute or the lease.
|
|||||
| Castillo v. Miller's Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 1 CA-CV 00-0271,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, May 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee insurer failed to offer UIM coverage for a vehicle by calling it mobile equipment. The vehicle was not an implement of husbandry, and was required by statute to have UIM coverage, therefore UIM coverage was imputed as a matter of law.
|
|||||
| Hill v. Peterson, 2 CA-CV 98-0153,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, May 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in dismissing employee's cause of action against former employer because NLRA did not preempt claim that, after he left his job, former employer tortiously interfered with his contractual relations with prospective employer.
|
|||||
| Saucedo v. Salvation Army, 1 CA-CV 00-0272,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, May 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages failed as a matter of law, as van driver's alleged aggravated course of conduct was not shown to have been a proximate cause of the harm inflicted upon the deceased.
|
|||||
| State v. Ward, 1 CA-CR 00-0497,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, May 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insane appellant's 15-year commitment was proper, as trial court had inherent power to impose consecutive sentences and duration of the sentence was equal to the statutory term of imprisonment that could have been imposed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
