Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Arizona - May 23, 2002
	People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of Tucson, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0156-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 23, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Court of appeals opinion allowing imposition of transaction privilege tax on cable company's telecommunications services by city was vacated by supreme court, as "interstate telecommunications services" required more expansive meaning. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Pricewaterhouse Coopers, Inc. v. Decca Design Build, Inc. (In re Price Waterhouse Ltd.), Supreme Court No. CV-01-0074-CQ, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, May 23, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Supreme Court of Arizona adopted partial subordination analysis, which meant that alteration of priority of liens between first and third lienholder by subordination agreement had no effect on second priority mechanic's lienholder. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Christian, 1 CA-CR 00-0654, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, May 23, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's prior drug conviction qualified as a historical prior felony conviction, as it was committed within the five years preceding instant conviction, and statute did not preclude its use to enhance punishment of subsequent conviction. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.