LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arizona - August 8 - August 19, 2004

  
State v. Moody, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's death sentence was vacated because trial judge's determination of aggravating factors was error in light of case law that required a jury determination of factors that increased punishment and where jury could have concluded differently.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Moody, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 8, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's death sentence for committing two murders was improper, as it could not be concluded beyond reasonable doubt that reasonable jury could not find other than trial court did on issue of special cruelty as aggravating factor.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State ex rel. Romley v. Dairman, 1 CA-SA 04-0110, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, August 10, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Statute authorizing trial court to appoint a representative for minor victim when defendant was part of victim's immediate family did not abolish trial court's equitable power and duty to appoint representative when defendant was not part of family.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Birt, 1 CA-CV 03-0258, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, August 12, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court had power to set aside dissolution decree to accomplish justice, including power to award support obligation, where husband discharged debts in bankruptcy shortly after decree was final to avoid effect on allocation of community debts.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Walker, 1 CA-CR 02-0982, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, August 12, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion for mistrial was properly denied based on finding that he voluntarily absented himself from part of his trial because he left home to visit the library when he knew he needed to remain home to be informed of the new trial setting.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Premium Cigars Int'l, Ltd. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. Agency, 1 CA-CV 03-0310, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, August 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: On plaintiff's appeal of adverse summary judgment in personal injury action, case was remanded for determination of whether plaintiff's claim sounded in tort or contract and was therefore assignable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State ex rel. Goddard v. Phoenix Union High Sch. Dist. No. 210, 1 CA-CV 03-0518, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, August 19, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: On school district's appeal of adverse judgment in age discrimination case, judgment was reversed; reduction in compensation at age 65 was not based on discriminatory intent, but was part of the entire retirement incentive.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.