 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Citizens Clean Elections Comm'n v. Myers, Supreme Court No. CV-00-0054-SA CONSOLIDATED with Supreme Court No. CV-00-0055-SA,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 16, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A ballot initiative violated the state constitution where it purported to involve the state commission on appellate court appointments, and members of the supreme court, in appointment of members to an election commission.
|
|||||
| Eller Media Co. v. City of Tucson, 2 CA-CV 99-0221,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, June 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Municipality's law furthered its interest in reducing light emissions into the night sky, such that, under applicable rational basis review, law did not violate plaintiff's substantive due process rights as a matter of law.
|
|||||
| Friedemann v. Kirk, 2 CA-CV 99-0176,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, June 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellee failed to meet the requirement of actual payment of the tax on February 23, 1999, and appellee's right to redeem the tax lien was foreclosed when the judgment was entered against her on March 8, 1999.
|
|||||
| Decola v. Freyer, 1 CA-CV 99-0536,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, June 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred when it determined that it did not have discretion to grant an extension of time for the appeal from the arbitration award under the rationale of the rules of civil appellate procedure.
|
|||||
| Tucson Unified Sch. Dist. v. Industrial Comm'n, 2 CA-IC 00-0003,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, June 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In order for a mental condition to be compensable, there had to be a causal connection between the condition and the employment, and where a mental condition was not compensable, physical manifestations of that condition were not compensable.
|
|||||
| State v. Affordable Bail Bonds, 1 CA-CV 00-0030,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police do not owe duty to bondsmen to respond to requests to apprehend fugitives within residences. Notification of whereabouts of fugitive did not constitute constructive surrender. Partial forfeiture of bond affirmed.
|
|||||
| T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial Comm'n, 1 CA-IC 99-0170,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's suicide was compensable under the workers' compensation law. His work-connected injuries resulted in his becoming devoid of normal judgment and dominated by a disturbance of mind directly caused by his injury.
|
|||||
| Michael J. v. Michael J., 1 CA-JV 99-0127,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, July 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court properly transferred jurisdiction of child's dependency proceedings to tribal court; paternity of Indian father was properly established, and there was no requirement of a significant tribal family connection.
|
|||||
| State v. Watson, 1 CA-CR 99-0342,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, July 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Safeguarding the general health, safety, and welfare and protecting aesthetic values by avoiding visual clutter were proper goals for municipal government. Ordinance passed rational basis scrutiny and was facially constitutional.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
