 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Hustad, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0044-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 29, 2000, Decided , September 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was ordered disbarred for violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer; he was also ordered to pay restitution to his client, and he was assessed the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceedings.
|
|||||
| In re Meyer, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0073-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 29, 2000, Decided , September 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an attorney disciplinary proceeding, respondent's prior disciplinary offenses, a pattern of misconduct, and bad faith obstruction of the disciplinary proceeding, suggested that disbarment was the appropriate sanction.
|
|||||
| Lake v. Reinstein, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-00-0155-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 29, 2000, Decided , September 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Jorgenson, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-00-0064-SA,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Intentional prosecutorial misconduct was aimed at preventing real party in interest's acquittal on murder charge and double jeopardy barred retrial as prosecutor's action deprived him of his right to have case fairly tried by jury selected.
|
|||||
| SAL Leasing, Inc. v. State ex rel. Napolitano, 1 CA-CV 99-0631,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, October 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellees' sale and lease-back transactions were consumer loans and not sales because the transactions were, in reality, loans in which vehicle title transfers served as security devices, and not bona fide sales.
|
|||||
| Walter v. Wilkinson, 1 CA-SA 00-0198,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, October 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Separate evaluations by three mental health experts to determine whether petitioner was a sexually violent person were proper because Arizona Sexually Violent Persons Act did not require simultaneous evaluations by all experts.
|
|||||
| In re Mettler, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0059-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 4, 2000, Decided , October 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State Bar's petition for review of a decision of the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona was denied. 30-day suspension and two-year probation was imposed for conversion of client funds from trust account.
|
|||||
| In re Rogers, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-99-0071-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 4, 2000, Decided , October 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Sorenson, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0060-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 4, 2000, Decided , October 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
