 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hunt v. Richardson, 1 CA-CV 06-0624,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, July 31, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding against the property owners in an action involving an easement was improper in part because issues of material fact existed pertaining to the property owners' ability to erect a gate and they presented a justiciable claim concerning the parties' responsibility for maintaining the easement.
|
|||||
| State v. Almly, 1 CA-CR 06-0471,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, July 31, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Charge was dismissed with prejudice where the State did not bring defendant to trial within 180 days of a valid second request under article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 31-481. Where both Article III and Article IV of the IAD was invoked, a dismissal was required if time limits under either were violated.
|
|||||
| State v. Le Noble, 1 CA-CR 06-0705,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, July 31, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Resisting arrest conviction was vacated because defendant had the right to a jury trial for this offense under Sixth Amendment, Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 23, and Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 24 whether it was a felony or a misdemeanor, there was no waiver found under Ariz. R. Crim. P. 18.1, and the failure to obtain a waiver constituted a structural error.
|
|||||
| In re Richard B., 1 CA-JV 07-0026,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, August 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile entered a guilty plea to driving under the influence. Although juvenile court set a seven-day deadline, juvenile court did not lack jurisdiction to set restitution order because the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in proceeding to a restitution hearing.
|
|||||
| State v. Connolly, 2 CA-CR 2006-0095,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a robbery case, the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in imposing a $ 20 time-payment fee in monthly installments upon defendant's release from prison because the trial court did not order defendant to pay a "penalty, fine, or sanction" under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-116(A).
|
|||||
| White v. Greater Ariz. Bicycling Ass'n, 2 CA-CV 2006-0207,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in denying adult children's motion for a new trial on the issue of damages, Ariz. R. Civ. P. 59, in their wrongful death action against a bicycle association where, pursuant to Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-613, the jury could not disregard the children's unequivocal testimony about facts demonstrating a compensable loss.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
