 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Childress Buick Co. v. O'Connell, 1 CA-CV 98-0354,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, October 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly held that ownership of vehicle had not passed to prospective buyer at time of accident and that tortfeasor had to reimburse dealer for damage. Buyer was not entitled to payment from tortfeasor's insurer.
|
|||||
| Aida Renta Trust v. Department of Revenue, 1 CA-CV 98-0389, 1 CA-CV 98-0390,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, October 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Property owners were not required to pay taxes under protest in order to preserve claims based on property valuations, but county did not violate equal protection or uniformity guarantees by settling another similar matter.
|
|||||
| In re Axford, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0068-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 10, 2000, Decided , October 10, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Respondent's conduct in not acting reasonably and diligently, in not keeping clients informed of status of their cases, and in engaging in misconduct regarding fee arbitration warranted six month and one day suspension, and lesser sanctions.
|
|||||
| Kelly v. Kelly, Supreme Court No. CV-98-0090-PR.,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 11, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Benjamin v. Gear Roller Hockey Equip., Inc., 1 CA-CV 99-0333,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, October 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant absolved itself from its own negligence through a liability waiver and release by clearly and explicitly stating in the agreement its intent to absolve itself from its own negligence.
|
|||||
| Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Apache Junction, 2 CA-CV 99-0198,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, October 12, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City did not have authority to impose building permit fees to defray costs of new school construction; authority over or responsibility for public schools was reserved to counties and the state.
|
|||||
| In re Creasy, Supreme Court No. SB-96-0043-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In disciplinary proceeding, disbarred attorney was found to have been practicing law when sworn statement was taken as part of arbitration proceeding. His actions could not be reclassified as that of an insurance adjuster.
|
|||||
| State v. Gill (In re $3636.24 U.S. Currency), 1 CA-CV 99-0475,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, October 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Language of forfeiture statute was clear and unambiguous and did not allow for trial court to excuse the State's failure to timely initiate forfeiture proceedings due to an oversight. Property was released from seizure.
|
|||||
| State v. Samano, 1 CA-CR 99-0394,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, October 17, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in applying sentence enhancement against defendant for dangerous crimes against children, where it failed to state on the record factual findings and reasons supporting imposition of an enhanced sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
