 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Rodriguez, 2 CA-CR 98-0599,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction of aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol not barred by double jeopardy or collateral estoppel; jury's inability to reach a verdict in earlier DUI trial did not carry collateral estoppel consequences.
|
|||||
| In re Gorman, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0061-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 21, 2000, Decided , July 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was censured and placed on probation for one year; he failed to adequately communicate with clients, was not diligent in handling client's matters, failed to serve defendant in one action, and failed to file a claim in another.
|
|||||
| Arizona Dep't of Revenue v. Care Computer Sys., Inc., 1 CA-TX 98-0003,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, July 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State department of revenue could lawfully impose transaction privilege tax on out-of-state company because trips by company's representatives were intended to encourage sales within state and established substantial nexus.
|
|||||
| Moretto v. Samaritan Health Sys., 1 CA-CV 99-0049,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, July 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because workers' compensation insurance carrier did not administer plaintiff's back injury, sustained while receiving treatment for occupational injury, as compensable claim, time limitation of reassignment statute did not apply.
|
|||||
| State v. Thompson, 1 CA-CR 99-0136,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, July 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Resolving ambiguity of recidivist sentencing statute, court found statute applied only when defendant had already been sentenced for prior felonies before committing the present offense.
|
|||||
| In re Shane B., Supreme Court No. CV-98-0422-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The retroactive application of a state statute to label juvenile as a first time felony juvenile offender was not improper, as the statute was procedural and affected only any future offenses, not the present offense.
|
|||||
| Park Cent. Mall, LLC v. Maricopa County, 1 CA-TX 98-0020,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, July 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Assessor's correction notice was premature and thus invalid to correct current year assessment error; it could not correct error until after third Monday of August of current year, so summary judgment granted for taxpayer.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
