 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cummins v. Mold-In Graphic Sys., 1 CA-CV 99-0559,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's wrongful discharge claim based upon the public policy exception to the employment at-will doctrine failed on appeal because the employee failed to prove actual illegality of the conduct requested of him.
|
|||||
| State v. Weekley, 1 CA-CR 99-0897,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, June 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No Fourth Amendment violation where hotel staff's search of room constituted private, rather than state, action. Subsequent entries into room by police did not exceed scope of hotel staff's search; thus there was no Fourth Amendment violation.
|
|||||
| W. Maricopa Combine, Inc. v. Ariz. Dep't of Water Res., 1 CA-CV 00-0086,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, June 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Consent of streambed owners was not required before company could make beneficial use of an existing natural watercourse to move its appropriated water and for water storage purposes.
|
|||||
| In re Kyle M., 1 CA-JV 00-0179,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile violated the criminal statute prohibiting threatening or intimidating by expressing a threat which was objectively understood, under the circumstances, to be a serious expression of an intent to inflict bodily harm.
|
|||||
| Paradigm Ins. Co. v. Langerman Law Offices, P.A., Supreme Court No. CV-99-0412-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 13, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insurer said firm committed negligence in defending insurer and insured in medical malpractice case, express agreement was not prerequisite to formation of attorney-client relationship, and firm had duty to non-client.
|
|||||
| In re Griffith, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0041-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 18, 2001, Decided , June 18, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Axen, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0093-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 19, 2001, Decided , June 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney represented both client and lender in trustee sale, attorney failed to obtain consent or to explain potential conflict, and attorney converted funds for his own use, attorney was suspended for three years.
|
|||||
| In re Walker, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0096-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 19, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Censure was proper because attorney did not intend to further his personal interests at the expense of his client's interests, the client's interests were not damaged, there were many mitigating factors, and there were no aggravating factors.
|
|||||
| State v. Viramontes, 2 CA-CR 00-0227,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, June 19, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Case remanded to trial court so that trial court could clarify ambiguity created by use of the term "presumptive" in its sentencing minute entry, and if appropriate, make any necessary corrections or, if necessary, resentence defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
