Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - Arizona - July 3 - July 25, 2003

  
In re One Residence at 319 E. Fairgrounds Dr., 2 CA-CV 2002-0117, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, July 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, Department A, held forfeiture of defendant's house relating to drug conviction, although subject to Eighth Amendment excessiveness review, did not amount to a punitive fine out of proportion to his crimes.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Soltero, 1 CA-CR 02-0698, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, July 3, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant could not avoid prosecution under the laws regulating driving under the influence by asserting that the State failed to inform him of the particulars of an amended statute that became effective immediately pursuant to an emergency clause.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Jones, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 7, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In Ring III review, Arizona Supreme Court could not conclude that trial judge's sentence of death under procedure found unconstitutional in Ring II was harmless beyond reasonable doubt, where jury could have found murder was not especially cruel.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Cazares, 2 CA-CR 2002-0187-PR, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 11, 2003, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where defendant's youthful age was apparent from his appearance in court, reflected in a presentence report, and stressed by defense counsel, the appellate court concluded that the sentencing court considered defendants' age in mitigation.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Lamar, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 17, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The trial court did not deny defendant's motion to represent himself by denying his motion for continuance as defendant did not explain why the denial would prejudice him. Witness's hearsay statement did not influence jury as to grant mistrial.

Search Cases for Free

  
Interlott Techs., Inc. v. Ariz. Dep't of Revenue, 1 CA-TX 02-0020, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, July 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where a foreign corporation leased 200 vending machines to the state lottery over several years and maintained 2 employees in the state, such constituted a sufficient nexus to make the corporation subject to the transaction privilege tax.

Search Cases for Free

  
State v. Darelli, 1 CA-CR 02-0432, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, July 22, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's refusal to accept anything but a plea of guilty as charged or a dismissal of all charges improperly interfered with plea negotiations in the district attorney's domain; hence, the convictions were vacated for negotiations to continue.

Search Cases for Free

  
Am. Pepper Supply Co. v. Fed. Ins. Co., 1 CA-CV 00-0549, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, July 24, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate court held that the insurance policy defense of concealment or misrepresentation was a specie of fraud and it therefore, had to be proven by an insurer by the clear and convincing evidence standard.

Search Cases for Free

  
Pleak v. Entrada, 2 CA-CV 2001-0100, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 25, 2003, Decided , July 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Pleak v. Entrada Prop. Owners' Ass'n, 2 CA-CV 2001-0100, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 25, 2003, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in granting the neighbor summary judgment, where its predecessor in interest dedicated the roadway easement to the public; as the neighbor was not the prevailing party, the award of attorney fees was in error.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top