 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| CDT, Inc. v. Addison, Roberts & Ludwig, 2 CA-CV 99-0048,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, August 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's accounting malpractice action based upon defendants' allegedly causing assessment of delinquent taxes against plaintiff did not accrue until plaintiff had actual or constructive knowledge of actual damage.
|
|||||
| Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fonk, 1 CA-CV 99-250,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, August 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Entitlement to underinsured motorist benefits was based on damages that exceeded tort-feasor's liability limit rather than being based on payment or exhaustion of those limits. Clause requiring exhaustion was unenforceable.
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Romley v. Superior Court, 1 CA-SA 00-0189,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, August 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: For civil commitment trial under Sexually Violent Persons Act, the jury consisted of eight persons, and the concurrence of six or more was sufficient to render a verdict, because the legislature did not require unanimity.
|
|||||
| State v. Johnson, 2 CA-CR 98-0572,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, August 24, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's conviction was reversed and vacated where the trial court allowed the information to be amended at the close of the State's case, depriving him of adequate notice of the charges and ample opportunity to defend.
|
|||||
| In re Carey, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0055-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 25, 2000, Decided , August 25, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court disbarred respondent and ordered him to pay restitution to the aggrieved client, finding that respondent had engaged in conduct in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer.
|
|||||
| In re Hull, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0071-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 28, 2000, Decided , August 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Savoy, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0070-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 28, 2000, Decided , August 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
