 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Leiber, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0122-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 2, 2001, Decided , July 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney was charged with failing to comply with trust account guidelines, with causing check to be returned for insufficient funds, and with commingling funds, attorney was publicly censured and placed on probation.
|
|||||
| State v. Sansing, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge properly considered the fact that a murder victim was conscious when stabbed to satisfy the requirement of murder committed in a cruel manner for purposes of aggravation of sentence in capital case.
|
|||||
| In re Kirkorsky, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0125-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 5, 2001, Decided , July 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney represented children in personal injury suit, and attorney failed to competently represent them by releasing settlement funds to their parents prior to establishing conservatorship, attorney was censured and placed on probation.
|
|||||
| In re Smith, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0124-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 5, 2001, Decided , July 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney admitted he failed to correctly identify client's representative, failed to advise client of risks of joint representation, and failed to get written consent for joint representation, attorney was censured and placed on probation.
|
|||||
| London Bridge Resort, Inc. v. Mohave County, 1 CA-TX 00-0013,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, July 10, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County did not exceed its authority in adopting its sales comparison valuation method to assess the value of time-share interests; method complied with requirement that condominium units be assessed and taxed separately.
|
|||||
| State v. Garcia, 1 CA-CR 99-0852,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, July 10, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two molestation convictions were affirmed but indecent exposure conviction was reversed where court did not fully consider the prejudicial effect of the testimony of several young victims, each testifying to multiple uncharged molestations.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
