 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Liristis v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 1 CA-CV 00-0539,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court improperly granted the insurer's summary judgment motion based on the insureds' claim for mold, as the policy did not expressly exclude mold, but rather, losses resulting from the mold.
|
|||||
| McNutt v. McNutt, 1 CA-CV 01-0255,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by attributing additional income to a father in a child custody determination based on the 80-hour workweek he had once worked. The phrase "full-time employment" in guidelines could encompass more than a 40 hour workweek.
|
|||||
| State v. Carlson, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0161-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Carrasco, 1 CA-CR 01-0876,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: DUI conviction was affirmed when there was no abuse of discretion in denying motion to suppress blood alcohol test results, as the person who drew defendant's blood was competent, by reason of training or experience in phlebotomy.
|
|||||
| State v. Joachim, 1 CA-CR 01-0726,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute that was enacted to provide an avenue for property owners, whether criminal suspects or not, to controvert a search warrant, was not intended to bind a superior court with the pretrial rulings of a justice of the peace in a civil matter.
|
|||||
| State v. Ryan, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0329-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, June 27, 2002, Decided , June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Schaffer, 1 CA-CR 01-0453,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prosthetic device could be "dangerous instrument" within meaning of aggravated assault statute and was question for jury. Trial court erred when it dismissed, on defense motion, charge of aggravated assault with prosthetic arm.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Thomas, 1 CA-CV 01-0086,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, June 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred when it awarded an adoptive mother and her former domestic partner joint custody of child, as applicable statute required findings that made it impossible for court to properly award custody to both legal and non-legal parent.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
