 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hull v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 2 CA-CV 2004-0016,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, October 26, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in denying a manufacturer's motion to dismiss consumers' action under Arizona's Lemon Law, as the consumers sold the truck at issue three weeks before trial; Lemon Law required that the consumers return the truck to manufacturer.
|
|||||
| State v. Lucero, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-04-0205-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Monaco, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-04-0154-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Williams, 1 CA-CR 03-0640,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, October 26, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly admitted prior acts evidence where in each incident, defendant followed the victims in his vehicle, pulled up to the victims and stopped beside them, partially removed his clothing, and masturbated while still driving his vehicle.
|
|||||
| Waterfall Economidis v. Pima County Ariz., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-04-0161-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Brown, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-03-0255-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was vacated because a sentence in excess of five years for reckless manslaughter could be imposed on defendant only after a jury finding of one or more of the aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| State v. Kuntz, 1 CA-CR 03-0180,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, October 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for failing to timely inform the county sheriff of a registered sex offender address change was reversed because the petitioner's foreign offense did not necessarily reflect that his misdeeds would have resulted in a conviction in Arizona.
|
|||||
| Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony Soc'y, 2 CA-CV 2003-0153,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, October 29, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In musicians' suit for unpaid wages, summary judgment in the symphony organization's favor was proper, as a provision in the labor agreement stating that the musicians would be paid over a 12-month period did not violate the applicable statute.
|
|||||
| Pargman v. Vickers, 1 CA-CV 03-0561,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, November 1, 2004, Decided , November 1, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
