 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lingel v. Olbin, 2 CA-CV 99-0061,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, August 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Agreements to assign or share proceeds from a wrongful death action, like other personal injury claims, were not enforceable in Arizona. Underinsured motorist proceeds used to pay wrongful death claim were not assignable.
|
|||||
| Mead v. Holzmann, 1 CA-CV 99-0640,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, August 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly refused to impute pre-tax income to father when calculating mother's child support obligation. Case was remanded for consideration of whether imposition of Child Support Guidelines was unjust.
|
|||||
| Special Fund Div. v. Arizona DOT, 1 CA-IC 99-0103,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, August 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's entire disability was properly based on entire loss of earning capacity. Compensation attributable to prior disabilities was deducted from entire disability compensation in accordance with apportionment statute.
|
|||||
| State v. Carlisle, 1 CA-CR 99-0329,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, August 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The offense of attempted sexual conduct with a minor under the age of 15 was a dangerous crime against children and the sentencing consequences were more severe than those described to appellant by the trial court.
|
|||||
| U. S.West Communs., Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Comm'n, 1 CA-CV 98-0672,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, August 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State corporation commission was required under state constitution to ascertain fair value of competitive phone companies' property within the state for purposes of setting rates, as it did for carrier of last resort.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
