 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Krausz v. Maricopa County, 1 CA-TX 00-0022,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, July 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The taxpayers's use of the property, rather than the tenant's use, controlled the property tax classification. The tax court properly approved the commercial classification of the taxpayers's office building.
|
|||||
| State v. Ehrlich (In re Leon G.), Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0062-PR CONSOLIDATED WITH Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0063-SA,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where two men were committed to state hospitals as sexually violent persons, the Arizona Supreme Court determined that Arizona's Sexually Violent Persons Act complied with the principles of substantive due process.
|
|||||
| State v. Powers, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0089-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a single accident involving the defendant, because the focus of the criminal statute was on the scene, not the victims, there could be only one charge filed against the defendant regardless of the number of victims.
|
|||||
| State v. Thompson, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0444-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for theft conviction was properly enhanced by prior drug convictions because the drug offense occurred before the theft and the drug convictions preceded the conviction on the theft offense.
|
|||||
| In re McCormick, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0105-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 13, 2001, Decided , July 13, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was disbarred and ordered to pay restitution for ethical violations including: (1) failing to provide accounting and to perform legal services; (2) failing to respond to State Bar's investigation; and (3) practicing law while suspended.
|
|||||
| In re Sterman, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0106-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 13, 2001, Decided , July 13, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for one year from the practice of law for misconduct related to filing claims without substantial justification, and for failure to pay sanctions for his misconduct.
|
|||||
| State v. Harrod, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 16, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of premeditated murder and felony murder after killing a wealthy widow for profit, it was not error to exclude third party culpability evidence and to allow defendant's ex-wife to testify against him.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
