LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Arizona - July 2 - July 3, 2002

  
Ariz. Dep't of Corr. v. State Pers. Bd., 1 CA-CV 01-0492, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, July 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred when it upheld state personnel board's reversal of department of corrections' decision to discipline one of its officers by demotion. Board's decision that demotion was excessive was not supported by required statutory grounds.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Meza, 1 CA-CR 00-0792, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, July 2, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err when it suppressed breath test results as sanction against State for various discovery violations committed by city's crime lab personnel when, inter alia, they lied about their ability to delete certain calibration results.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Cimino, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0086-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Attorney was suspended from practice for one year followed by two years' probation, and ordered to pay restitution and costs, where, inter alia, he did not communicate with clients or provide them with billing statements or an account of his time.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Harrison, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0079-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Suspended attorney was disbarred where, inter alia, the attorney's repeated unauthorized practice of law during her suspension period added additional impetus for sanction of disbarment as well as her failure to cooperate in disciplinary proceedings.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Hegberg, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0089-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Attorney was disbarred where he stole money from his clients in an amount in excess of $ 150,000, and he fraudulently drew checks in an approximate amount of $ 100,000, for clients, for which insufficient funds existed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Odneal, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0085-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Attorney was suspended for 90 days followed by 2 years of probation where, although her client representation was not questioned, she had, on several occasions, failed to provide an accounting and failed to cooperate with bar's investigation.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Silkey, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0084-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Attorney was suspended for four years and ordered to pay restitution and costs where, in numerous situations, he took retainers from clients, and, inter alia, failed to represent clients with reasonable diligence, and failed to provide accounting.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
May v. Weisberg, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0206-SA, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where election commission satisfied all requirements for issuance of a stay by the supreme court, court issued a stay enjoining the immediate effectiveness of the court of appeals opinion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.