|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - July 2 - July 3, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re Cimino, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0086-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was suspended from practice for one year followed by two years' probation, and ordered to pay restitution and costs, where, inter alia, he did not communicate with clients or provide them with billing statements or an account of his time.
|
|
| |
In re Harrison, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0079-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Suspended attorney was disbarred where, inter alia, the attorney's repeated unauthorized practice of law during her suspension period added additional impetus for sanction of disbarment as well as her failure to cooperate in disciplinary proceedings.
|
|
| |
In re Hegberg, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0089-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was disbarred where he stole money from his clients in an amount in excess of $ 150,000, and he fraudulently drew checks in an approximate amount of $ 100,000, for clients, for which insufficient funds existed.
|
|
| |
In re Odneal, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0085-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 90 days followed by 2 years of probation where, although her client representation was not questioned, she had, on several occasions, failed to provide an accounting and failed to cooperate with bar's investigation.
|
|
| |
In re Silkey, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0084-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 3, 2002, Decided , July 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was suspended for four years and ordered to pay restitution and costs where, in numerous situations, he took retainers from clients, and, inter alia, failed to represent clients with reasonable diligence, and failed to provide accounting.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|