Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Arizona - July 17 - July 29, 2002
	STATE v. RING, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0378-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0243-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0328-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0360-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0447-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0275-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0508-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0544-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0595-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0091-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0100-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0103-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0129-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0421-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0296-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0551-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0376-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0317-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0488-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0278-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 17, 2002, Decided , July 17, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Jesus M. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ. Sec., 2 CA-JV 2001-0095, 2 CA-JV 2001-0097 (Consolidated), COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 18, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Appellate court rejected father's suggestion that it ignore four years he already spent in incarceration and instead focus on amount of time remaining on sentence. Entire period of absence from home relevant in termination of parental rights cases. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Robson Ranch Mts., L.L.C. v. Pinal County, 2 CA-CV 2002-0054, 2 CA-CV 2002-0060 (Consolidated), COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 18, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Referendum petitions challenging county rezoning ordinance were untimely; the 30-day time period for filing petitions commenced when ordinance was enacted, not when elections director obtained ordinance and provided it to the referendum proponent. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Powers v. Carpenter, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0227-AP/EL, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 22, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Hughes v. Jorgenson, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0336-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 23, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Conflict of interest charge was dismissed when absent any proof of non-remote pecuniary or proprietary interests, the finding of probable cause was in error. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State ex rel. Romley v. Martin, 1 CA-SA 02-0125, 1 CA-SA 02-0126, (Consolidated), COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, July 23, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Special jurisdiction was accepted and the trial court properly denied State's request to use felony convictions sentenced under probation for persons convicted of personal possession and use of controlled substances for impeachment purposes. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Logan v. Forever Living Prods. Int'l, Inc., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0367-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 25, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Employer who, by his agent, terminated an employee for refusing to be the victim of workplace extortion because the employee would not sell his land to the employer at the employer's price was subject to a wrongful termination suit. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Moore v. Browning, 2 CA-SA 2002-0021, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, July 25, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Arizona Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) displaced common law cause of action for fraudulent conveyance. Accordingly, creditor had to file amended complaint alleging fraudulent transfer within one year of actual or constructive discovery. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Paxson v. Glovitz, 1 CA-CV 01-0571, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, July 25, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A prescriptive easement was established as a matter of law where easement was created in 1979 and had been actually and visibly used since that time, a period of more than 10 years, even thought the easement had never been recorded. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Smith, Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, July 29, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's hybrid motion for a change of venue and a change of judge was properly treated as a motion for change of judge because motion for change of venue specifically excluded motions based on "the interest or prejudice of the trial judge." Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.