 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System an Source, Supreme Court Nos. WC-90-0001-IR, WC-90-0002-IR, WC-90-0003-IR, WC-90-0004-IR, WC-90-0005-IR, WC-90-0006-IR, WC-90-0007-IR, WC-79-0001, WC-79-0002, WC-79-0003, WC-79-0004.,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 22, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court properly determined that wells located within the lateral limits of the subflow zone, and wells outside the subflow zone that were pumping water from a stream or its subflow, were subject to the adjudication.
|
|||||
| In re Sabino R., 1 CA-JV 00-0019,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, September 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judicial notice was taken of juvenile's age for purposes of affirming underage consumption of alcohol delinquency adjudication because a court could have taken judicial notice of the records of another action tried in same court.
|
|||||
| State v. Donald, 1 CA-CR 97-0551-PR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, September 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner suffered a constitutionally significant injury when he rejected the favorable plea bargain due to his counsel's ineffective assistance, and his receipt of a fair trial did not remedy the injury.
|
|||||
| State v. Lopez, 1 CA-CR 99-0945,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, September 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in suppressing evidence. Vehicle search incident to driver's arrest allowed inspection of all containers found within the passenger compartment, including the contents of passenger's backpack.
|
|||||
| State v. Mach, No. CR-00-0097-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Miranda, 1 CA-CR 99-0550,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, September 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's three convictions of disorderly conduct did not violate Double Jeopardy Clause because evidence supported finding that appellant fired three shots, thereby disturbing the peace of both victims and the neighborhood.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
