 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Joel R., 2 CA-JV 01-0004,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, August 21, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Use of siren in chasing minor's vehicle fleeing from police officer whose vehicle had lights flashing was only required under relevant statute when such use was "reasonably necessary," and minor did not show use of siren was reasonably necessary.
|
|||||
| In re Murphy, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0113-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 24, 2001, Decided , August 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Calnimptewa v. Flagstaff Police Dep't, 1 CA-CV 00-0552,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, August 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in dismissing wrongful death action because the immunity statute covering a release from custody did not cover a decision that merely changed the identity of the custodian.
|
|||||
| Kerr v. Killian, 1 CA-TX 00-0023,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, August 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where taxpayers filed class action suit to appeal ruling that taxpayers were not due refund, court of appeals held Arizona's income taxing scheme did not violate federal law and tax court did not err by denying class certification.
|
|||||
| Manterola v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 2 CA-CV 00-0108,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, August 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Final outcome of declaratory relief action did not control when cause of action accrued and when limitations period began to run, and thus did not toll statute of limitations for assignee to file bad faith claim against an insurance company.
|
|||||
| Ariz. Dep't of Revenue v. Dougherty, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-00-0242-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 29, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where taxpayer challenged denial of refund, only taxpayers whose claims were not barred by statute of limitations, and who could file separate claims at time taxpayer filed her representative claim, could join as members of class in tax court.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
