|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - August 28 - September 4, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Ring, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0378-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0243-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0328-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0360-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0447-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0275-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0508-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0544-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0595-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0091-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0100-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0103-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0129-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0421-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0296-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0551-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0376-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0317-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0488-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0278-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 28, 2002, Decided , August 28, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Bloxham v. Glock Inc., 2 CA-CV 2002-0012,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, August 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Appellees, gun manufacturer and gun show promoter, had no duty to control third party who used manufacturer's gun purchased from show to murder parents' children; thus, parents failed to allege facts justifying imposing a duty on appellees.
|
|
| |
McRae Invs. v. State, 1 CA-CV 01-0582,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, August 29, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: State was not bound by the five-year limitations period in judgment renewal statutes or the requirement to renew the judgment, and the State was not, therefore, precluded from enforcing a judgment, even after the five-year period expired.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re Tucker, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0120-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 4, 2002, Decided , September 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was censured and placed on probation for one year, as attorney placed his own funds in trust account, failed to safeguard client funds, failed to reconcile trust account monthly, and failed to maintain trust account records.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|