Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Arizona - November 1 - November 6, 2007
  
Farris v. Advantage Capital Corp., Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-07-0114-CQ, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Creditor could properly file a lis pendens under Ariz. Rev. Stat. ? 12-1191(A) when filing an action under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), Ariz. Rev. Stat. ?? 44-1001 to 44-1010 to void a debtor's allegedly fraudulent transfer of real property because a UFTA action was an action "affecting title to real property."

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. Coghill, 2 CA-CR 2006-0215, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, November 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a child pornography case, a court erred by admitting evidence under Ariz. R. Evid. 404(b) that defendant downloaded and saved adult pornography because that evidence had no special relevance to show knowledge, opportunity, or intent, nor was it admissible to show that defendant had a propensity to download child pornography.

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. Rojers, 1 CA-CR 06-0445, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, November 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in concluding that evidence discovered by a police officer in defendant's car was admissible under the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment because the evidence would inevitably have been discovered during a valid inventory search that would have taken place after the car was impounded.

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. Teagle, 1 CA-CR 06-0590, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, November 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A public safety officer did not act unreasonably by detaining defendant for one hour and forty minutes pending the arrival of a drug-detection dog. The nearest available canine unit, which was approximately 60 miles away, arrived 68 minutes after being called to the scene.

Search Cases for Free
  
State v. Arellano, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-07-0144-SA, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 2, 2007, Decided, November 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Gravel Res. of Ariz. v. Hills, No. 1 CA-CV 06-0620, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, November 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
In re MH 2006-002044 A, 1 CA-MH 06-0034, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, November 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An order requiring appellant to undergo a combination of inpatient and outpatient treatment for a mental health condition was upheld where Ariz. Rev. Stat. ? 36-527(A) (2003) did not require the trial court to dismiss the petition for court-ordered evaluation on the ground that it was not filed within 24 hours of taking appellant into custody.

Search Cases for Free
  
Lofts at Fillmore Condo. Ass'n v. Reliance Commer. Constr., Inc., 1 CA-CV 06-0257, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, November 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Palmer v. Palmer, 1 CA-CV 06-0674, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, November 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.