Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Arizona - August 9 - August 19, 2002
	In re Connelly, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0055-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 9, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Where lawyer and client agreed to binding fee arbitration, and client filed disciplinary complaint before arbitration, state bar should have awaited conclusion of fee arbitration proceedings before initiating formal disciplinary proceedings. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Powers v. Carpenter, Supreme Court No. CV-02-0227-AP/EL, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 9, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Withdrawal requests for signatures on nominating petition for candidate for constable were valid where they were withdrawn before the expiration of 10-day statutory challenge period that constituted the event which caused official action to commence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In re Piatt, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-02-0092-D, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 12, 2002, Decided , August 12, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	STATE v. RING, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0378-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0243-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0328-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0360-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0447-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0275-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0508-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0544-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0595-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0091-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0100-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0103-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0129-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0421-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0296-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0551-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0376-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0317-PR, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0488-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0278-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 12, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Yes for Arizona! v. Wiers, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0238-SA, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 12, 2002, Decided , August 12, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State v. Herrera, 2 CA-CR 2001-0371, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, August 13, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A court, in defendant's DUI case, did not err by allowing his wife to testify because the exception to the marital privilege applied because defendant's children were riding with him while he was under the influence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	STATE v. RING, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0378-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0243-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0328-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0360-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0447-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0275-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0508-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0544-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0595-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0091-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0100-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0103-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0129-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0421-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0296-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0551-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0376-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0317-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0488-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0278-AP, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 14, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Putz v. Indus. Comm'n, 1 CA-IC 01-0103, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, August 15, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Licensed residential contractor, who hired occasional short-term labor, was not an employer for workers' compensation purposes, where the contractor hired extra labor only occasionally and unpredictably. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Webb v. State, 1 CA-CV 01-0010, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, August 15, 2002, Decided , August 15, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Gonzales v. City of Phoenix, Supreme Court No. CV-01-0170-PR, SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 19, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Appellate court incorrectly reversed verdict in favor of a store manager in a suit brought against a police detective and city alleging malicious prosecution, as a jury could have believed there was no probable cause to support criminal charges. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.