 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allstate Ins. Co. v. Universal Underwriters, Inc., 2 CA-CV 99-0139,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, December 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Application of the statute's provisions was not limited to only situations when, at the time of the incident giving rise to the loss, a vehicle's operator was performing some function for the business.
|
|||||
| Andrews v. Eddie's Place, Inc., 2 CA-CV 99-0162,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, December 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In personal injury suit brought by injured motorist against bar for serving patron who was then involved in car accident, trial court erred in applying statute of limitations: two years was the applicable limitations period.
|
|||||
| Gunnell v. Arizona Pub. Serv. Co., 1 CA-CV 99-0510,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, December 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs were properly found liable under the Underground Facilities Act, as plaintiff husband did not notify defendant of the unmarked electric pipe and did not verify whether the pipe was abandoned before cutting into it.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Tangreen, 1 CA-CV 99-0542,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, December 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute allowing grandparent visitation was constitutional and did not impermissibly distinguish between two-parent and stepparent adoptions by excepting latter case from visitation termination upon child's adoption.
|
|||||
| Kelly v. Nationsbanc Mortg. Corp., 1 CA-CV 99-0642,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, December 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly granted summary judgment, because plaintiffs' bankruptcy filing, which postponed the trustee's sale of their property, did not compel defendant to give them additional notice of the new sale date.
|
|||||
| State v. Logan, 1 CA-CR 99-1041,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, December 26, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fundamental error occurred when the trial court failed to instruct the jury that it must find that appellant acted "without lawful authority" in obtaining the victim's property; therefore, court reversed and remanded.
|
|||||
| In re Kistler, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0098-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney who participated in a court proceeding while on administrative suspension and used his old attorney letterhead in correspondence for the benefit of another was censured and placed on probation.
|
|||||
| State v. Hoskins, Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Twenty year-old car-jacker's premeditated murder death sentence, where only aggravator found was pecuniary gain, and jury rejected felony murder conviction, was upheld. There was no causal connection between personality mitigators and crime.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
