 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hughes v. Martin, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0222-AP/EL,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 20, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Two voter-approved propositions did not conflict, and as such, the state mine inspector could serve a four-year term and was limited to four consecutive terms.
|
|||||
| State v. Prion, Supreme Court No. CR-99-0378-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 20, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of murder, kidnapping, and aggravated assault, it was reversible error to exclude third party culpability evidence and to not sever the crimes against the second victim from the murder of the first victim.
|
|||||
| DUWA, Inc. v. City of Tempe, 1 CA-CV 01-0598,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, August 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After a proposed redevelopment plan, where business failed to demonstrate that city either physically invaded its property or otherwise exercised dominion or control over its property, a de facto taking of the business's property did not occur.
|
|||||
| State v. Fell, 2 CA-SA 2002-0048,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, August 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The real party in interest was charged with DUI after she drove away from her home, fearing that her husband would return. Defense of necessity was not extended to DUI offenses, and the trial court erred in ruling otherwise.
|
|||||
| Hernandez v. State, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0437-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Supreme Court of Arizona conclude that rule of evidence dealing with admissibility of offers of compromise did not preclude use of impeachment materials contained in notice of claim when evidence was introduced to impeach party's credibility.
|
|||||
| Krohn v. Sweetheart Prop. (In re Krohn), Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0246-CQ,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, August 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trustee's sale of real property under a deed of trust in compliance with applicable law could have been set aside solely on the basis that the bid price was grossly inadequate, which was proof of unfairness.
|
|||||
| Long v. Napolitano, 1 CA-CV 02-0036,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, August 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Part of tourism and sports authority legislation that allowed authority to pledge "all" monies received by it violated constitutional state-debt restriction. However, balance of section that permitted authority to pledge "part" of monies was valid.
|
|||||
| Tenet HealthSystem TGH, Inc. v. Silver, 2 CA-CV 2001-0172,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, August 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erroneously found that credit purchase of a secured property at a trustee's sale extinguished the guarantors' liability, where language in a guaranty declared the guarantor's liability was "absolute, unconditional, and irrevocable."
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
