 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Det. of Stephen H., 1 CA-MH 02-0017SP,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, October 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commitment under Arizona's Sexually Violent Persons Act was reinstated, as the State adequately demonstrated that the patient lacked control because of a mental disorder, not a voluntary choice, making him likely to commit sexually violent acts.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Mohave County, 1 CA-CV 03-0072,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, October 14, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The intergovernmental agreement between governmental entities was not subject to the statutory public auction requirement; therefore, the absence of a public auction did not require the unanimous consent of the county board of supervisors.
|
|||||
| State v. Montano, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's death sentence was improper where the especially cruel finding regarding the victim's death was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| Behrens v. O'Melia, 1 CA-SA 03-0146,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, October 23, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the change of venue because the trial court had good and sufficient cause to transfer the suit against defendants so that it could be consolidated with the ongoing action against the City.
|
|||||
| Avila v. Biedess, 1 CA-CV 02-0648, 1 CA-CV 02-0741, (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, October 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in awarding judgment to aliens in action against Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System challenging constitutionality of state law limiting eligibility for Arizona's Medicaid program, because the law did not violate equal protection.
|
|||||
| State v. Dann, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 29, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's death penalty sentence was vacated where it was imposed pursuant to an unconstitutional procedure, and the court could not say that the trial court's finding that the mitigating factors were insufficient for leniency was harmless error.
|
|||||
| E. Vanguard Forex, LTD v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n, 1 CA-CV 01-0476,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, October 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Arizona Corporation Commission's determination that three officers of currency trading firms were presumptively liable for controlling person liability under state law, where scienter was not required, was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| State v. Cabanas-Salgado, 1 CA-CR 02-0456,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, October 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's felony murder conviction was affirmed, where the conviction was based on the underlying charge of transportation of cocaine for sale; the State of Arizona did not have to prove that defendant how much cocaine was being transported.
|
|||||
| State v. Davis, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0423-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 30, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 52-year sentence for four counts of sexual misconduct with a minor was grossly disproportionate to his crimes, because the post-pubescent victims were willing participants. They sought out defendant by voluntarily going to his home.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
