 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Goff, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0152-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 11, 2001, Decided , September 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney negligently failed to keep trust account records and placed his own funds in his trust account causing potential injury to clients, attorney was properly censured and placed upon terms of probation.
|
|||||
| In re Vice, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0128-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 11, 2001, Decided , September 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A lawyer who committed the crime of multiple acts of assault on his wife, failed to follow court orders, interfered with judicial proceedings, and abandoned his clients was suspended for six-months and one day, along with other sanctions.
|
|||||
| Special Fund Div. v. Tabor, 1 CA-IC 99-0172,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, September 11, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Special fund was not precluded from arguing that hearing officer erred in awarding reimbursement of workers' compensation payments to employer where elements of issue preclusion were not satisfied, and fund was not notified of the claim.
|
|||||
| In re Cheadle, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0116-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 12, 2001, Decided , September 12, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney charged with ethical violations was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.
|
|||||
| Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc., Supreme Court No. CV-00-0006-CQ,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 13, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arizona Supreme Court concluded that punitive damages can be assessed against a deceased tortfeasor's estate, and a corporate defendant can be held vicariously liable for exemplary damages caused by deceased employee's acts.
|
|||||
| State v. Gigliotti, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0161-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 18, 2001, Decided , September 18, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ibanez, 1 CA-CR 00-0821 RT,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, September 18, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Rule requiring automatic reversal whenever a defendant was forced to peremptorily challenge a juror who should have been excused for cause continued to apply in Arizona despite more flexible federal constitutional rule.
|
|||||
| State v. Roman, 1 CA-CR 00-0522,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, September 18, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arizona statute requiring probation for certain drug possession offenses applied to drug possession offenses that occurred in community, not in jail or prison, and did not mandate probation for crime of promoting prison contraband.
|
|||||
| Steiger v. Woods, 1 CA-CV 00-0081, 1 CA-CV 00-0084 (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, September 18, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Law firm was retained, at state expense, to represent assistant attorney general. Firm was, in fact, retained to provide personal criminal defense in investigation. Statute did not authorize this type of public funding.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
