 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hallmark Indus. v. First Systech Int'l, Inc., 2 CA-CV 2001-0186,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, September 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The intertwining doctrine was inapplicable and incompatible with Arizona law, which favored arbitration. The company could not avoid arbitration, even though only some claims were arbitrable, as a court could not refuse an arbitration agreement.
|
|||||
| Weatherford v. State, 1 CA-CV 01-0289, 1 CA-CV 01-0496 (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, September 10, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where case law precedent clearly established that minor had a right to reasonable safety in foster care, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on guardian ad litem's ¿ 1983 claim against the State on the basis of qualified immunity.
|
|||||
| In re Wilber W., 1 CA-MH 01-0008 SP,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, September 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sexually Violent Persons Act was constitutional and required proof of serious difficulty controlling behavior and juries in commitment hearings under the Act had to be instructed on requirement to find serious difficulty in controlling behavior.
|
|||||
| Yes for Arizona! v. Wiers, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0238-SA,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 11, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Political committee had not waived its objections to a legislative council's analysis of a proposition on the regulation of Indian gaming, because a copy of the proposed amendments were not given to it until the hearing was nearly completed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
