|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - September 26 - September 27, 2002
|
| |
Flanders v. Maricopa County, 1 CA-CV 01-0239,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, September 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a suit brought by jail inmate, who was severely injured after being brutally attacked by other inmates, against a county and a sheriff, evidence supported the jury's finding of deliberate indifference to inmate safety.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
State v. Old W. Bonding Co., 1 CA-CV 01-0436, 1 CA-CV 01-0499, 1 CA-CV 01-0510, 1 CA-CV 01-0512 (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, September 26, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a consolidated case, the trial court entered judgments forfeiting six defendants' appearance bonds, based on its mistaken belief that forfeiture was mandated when the bonding companies failed to justify defendants' non-appearances.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Velez, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0096-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 27, 2002, Decided , September 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was suspended for three months and placed on probation for two years, where, inter alia, he negligently misappropriated client funds, commingled funds, and lapsed in record-keeping procedures including the failure to keep client ledgers.
|
|
| |
In re Willis, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0112-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 27, 2002, Decided , September 27, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where attorney failed to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing the client, failed to appear in court on the client's behalf, and failed to protect the clients interests, attorney was suspended for a period of one year.
|
|
| |
STATE v. RING, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0378-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0243-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0328-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0360-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0447-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0275-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0508-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0544-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0595-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0091-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0100-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0103-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0129-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0421-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0296-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0551-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0376-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0317-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0488-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0278-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free
|
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback