 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Collette v. Tolleson Unified Sch. Dist., 1 CA-CV 01-0490,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: School district had no duty to family injured when one of its student's, after violating school's modified closed-campus policy, collided with family's car while returning to school from lunch, even if lunchtime schedule negligently imposed.
|
|||||
| Donlann v. Macgurn, 1 CA-CV 01-0095,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred when it concluded that a marriage that took place in Mexico was invalid; under the state's solemnization provision, all that was required was a good faith belief that the ceremony was performed by someone in authority.
|
|||||
| In re Gatti, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0128-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 12, 2002, Decided , September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was censured and ordered to pay costs in Oregon because he misrepresented himself as a chiropractor to get information in a case against some of his clients. The Supreme Court of Arizona imposed the same reciprocal sanction.
|
|||||
| In re Hall, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0122-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 12, 2002, Decided , September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney used client funds in trust account to cover other clients' costs, failed to hold his funds separate from clients' funds, had several overdrafts, and failed to monitor his client's funds, censure and probation were imposed.
|
|||||
| In re Magid, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0129-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 12, 2002, Decided , September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A reciprocal discipline was imposed, censuring an attorney who was reprimanded in a foreign state for ignoring his foreign clients' interests and failing to communicate with them when he moved to Arizona.
|
|||||
| In re Morrison, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0125-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 12, 2002, Decided , September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney failed to comply with the his mandatory continuing legal education requirements and was suspended, but nevertheless entered his appearance and filed a motion in domestic relations matter while suspended, censure was appropriate.
|
|||||
| In re Niky R., 1 CA-JV 01-0192,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence that the juvenile posed a significant risk to the community justifying his commitment. The juvenile had a history of delinquent behavior and did not cooperate with rehabilitative services.
|
|||||
| State v. Booker, 2 CA-CR 2000-0517,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, September 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury instructions on premeditation and accomplice liability were proper, and defendant's convictions for first-degree murder and drive-by shooting were proper. However, two-year enhancements to sentences based on release status were improper.
|
|||||
| In re Phillips, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0127-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 13, 2002, Decided , September 13, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was censured and placed on two-years probation, where he failed to adequately supervise subordinate attorneys and non-lawyer assistants concerning limitations on applicability of firm's advertised "little or no money down" payment plans.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
