 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wolfinger v. Cheche, 1 CA-CV 02-0421, 1 CA-CV 02-0422 (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, December 9, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probable cause existed for appellees to pursue the second case; facts showed that the WICP claim against the attorneys was objectively reasonable as defined by Arizona law, even though the ultimate result in Case II was in favor of the attorneys.
|
|||||
| Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire, L.L.C. v. Naranjo, 2 CA-CV 2003-0009,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, December 10, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On family's appeal of summary judgment for tire company in declaratory action, judgment was affirmed; trial court properly granted summary judgment for tire company based on satisfaction of judgment in family's case against vehicle rental agency.
|
|||||
| Cimarron Foothills Cmty. Ass'n v. Kippen, 2 CA-CV 2003-0048,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, December 10, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On homeowners' appeal of denial of fair housing accommodation, judgment was affirmed; homeowners failed to demonstrate that but for the accommodation, their residents would be denied the opportunity to enjoy the housing of their choice.
|
|||||
| Facilitec, Inc. v. Hibbs, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0412-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 10, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In contract bidder's review of trial court judgment in state procurement protest, trial court's judgment was reversed; director could delegate to deputy director the authority to make the final decision on the appeal of a procurement protest.
|
|||||
| Kocher v. Dep't of Revenue , 1 CA-TX 03-0002,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, December 11, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed tax court's judgment that taxpayers were Arizona residents throughout 1995 tax year and therefore not entitled to subtract stock option income from gross income; taxpayers did not show that they moved to Arizona for a temporary period.
|
|||||
| London v. Broderick, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-03-0090-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 11, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probation department employee who was facing disciplinary charges could not obtain disclosure of the department's investigatory file pertaining to those charges before his pre-disciplinary interview, as the file was not subject to disclosure.
|
|||||
| State v. Tsinnijinnie, 1 CA-CR 02-0958,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, December 11, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's sentencing of defendant to concurrent sentences was reversed; pursuant to applicable statute, the trial court was required to impose consecutive sentences for defendant's convictions for sexual assault and molestation of a child.
|
|||||
| Town of Marana v. Aegis of Arizona, LLC, 2 CA-CV 2003-0057,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, December 17, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Weatherford v. State, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0369-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 17, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State supreme court vacated trial court's grant of summary judgment to child's social workers and remanded the matter to apply new standard that it established to determine liability of a social worker to a foster care child in ¿ 1983 cases.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
