 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lombardo v. Albu, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0316-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 13, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Buyer's real estate agent's fiduciary duty to the buyer did not preclude legal duty to the seller. Since the buyer had a duty to disclose her financial difficulties to the seller, her agent did as well.
|
|||||
| In re Farley, Supreme Court No. SB-00--0088-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 18, 2000, Decided , December 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended from practicing law for three years as a sanction for committing two felonies. The sanction was limited to a suspension because no factors were present in aggravation and six factors were present in mitigation.
|
|||||
| In re Inactive Member of State Bar (Dellacona), Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-00-0092-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Murray, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0093-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 18, 2000, Decided , December 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Whitten, Supreme Court No. SB-00-0086-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 18, 2000, Decided , December 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer was suspended from practicing law for two years for multiple acts of negligence involving multiple clients, coupled with a failure to cooperate with the state bar during its investigation.
|
|||||
| Robertson v. Motor Cargo, Inc., Arizona Supreme Court CV-00-0057-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 18, 2000, Decided , December 18, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pinedo v. State DOT, 2 CA-CV 00-0016,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, December 19, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Issues in appellant agency's license revocation hearing were limited by statute, so determination of whether the police an officer had legal grounds for the underlying initial stop was beyond the scope of the hearing.
|
|||||
| Tripati v. State, CA-CV 00-0263,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, December 19, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of appellant inmates' federal claims was reversed and remanded because he sufficiently alleged that prison employees acted intentionally and pursuant to established state procedures.
|
|||||
| U S West Communs. v. Arizona Dept of Revenue, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-00-0022-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A party seeking to obtain relief from a judgment entered after remand from an appellate court was not required to first apply to the appellate court for permission to pursue its motion in the trial court.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
