 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Carrington v. Arizona Corp. Comm'n, CA-CV 00-0257,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State agencies were acting within their authority when they issued subpoenas requiring entrepreneur, who sold life insurance policies of terminally ill persons, to provide testimony and produce certain documents.
|
|||||
| In re Dayvid S., 1 CA-JV 00-0112,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding of delinquency was upheld because there was sufficient evidence to support the finding, and the statute was not vague or overbroad because a person of ordinary intelligence could determine what conduct fell within the acts prohibited.
|
|||||
| In re United States Currency in the Amount of $26,980.00, 2 CA-CV 00-0051,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT B, December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County failed to prove by preponderance of evidence that seized currency was traceable to drug activity, so court properly ordered county to return the funds; case was remanded for award of interest earned plus post-judgment interest.
|
|||||
| Leal v. Allstate Ins. Co., 1 CA-CV 00-0041,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the insurance company owed no duty to third parties injured by negligence of its insured to negotiate a settlement in good faith, the trial court properly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim.
|
|||||
| Robertson v. Motor Cargo, 1 CA-CV 97-0395, 1 CA-CV 98-0186 (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT A, December 21, 2000, Decided , December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Anderson, 1 CA-CR 99-0840,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Stalking statute was unconstitutionally vague because it proscribed essentially the same conduct as both a class 3 felony and a class 5 felony; remanded to determine whether defendant understood consequences of admissions at sentencing.
|
|||||
| State v. Canion, 1 CA-CR 99-0255,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for felony murder and second degree murder should not have been merged because the convictions were for the same act.
|
|||||
| Zuther v. State, Supreme Court No. CV-99-0425-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 21, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: New gate money statutes were applicable to an inmate, who was convicted of a felony prior to the enactment of these new laws, as the inmate was not released prior to the effective date of the new laws.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
