 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Romney, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0104-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 30, 2002, Decided , September 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The attorney was reinstated as a member of the bar after demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that he complied with the disciplinary orders and rules, had been rehabilitated, and demonstrated competence and a fitness to practice.
|
|||||
| In re Winski, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0105-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, September 30, 2002, Decided , September 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney should have been disbarred because of numerous, significant complaints against him, but he was suspended for 4 years and 11 months; commission took into account psychological effect of his father's incarceration as mitigating factor.
|
|||||
| State v. Juarez, 1 CA-CR 01-1091,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, October 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant charged with possessory offense did not have automatic standing to challenge search and seizure in which other's rights violated. Defendant, who sought to exclude evidence, had to show legitimate expectation of privacy in area searched.
|
|||||
| State v. Ring, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0378-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0243-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0328-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0360-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0447-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0275-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0508-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0544-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0595-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0091-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0100-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0103-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0129-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0421-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0296-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0551-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0376-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0317-PR, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0488-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0278-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Greer v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co., 1 CA-CV 01-0397,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, October 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a surgery aggravated an employee's industrial injury, the workers' compensation carrier's lien against a medical malpractice settlement did not apply to benefits paid before the malpractice but did apply to benefits paid after the malpractice.
|
|||||
| In re Alcorn, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0097-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 3, 2002, Decided , October 3, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney made repeated violations of his duties of diligence, communication, and expediting litigation and violated court rules, clients suffered serious or potentially serious injury and proper discipline was suspension of attorney.
|
|||||
| State v. Ring, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0243-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0272-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0536-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0439-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0328-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0360-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0447-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0275-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0508-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0544-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-00-0595-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0091-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0100-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0103-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0129-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0270-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-01-0421-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0042-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0044-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0296-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0551-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-99-0438-AP, Supreme Court No. CR-98-0289-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0376-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0317-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0488-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0349-AP, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-98-0278-AP,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
