 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People's Choice TV Corp. v. City of Tucson, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-01-0156-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, October 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Carrasco, 2 CA-CR 00-0337,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, October 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney was found guilty of obstructing a criminal investigation where he represented a child molester and misrepresented that he was the victim's attorney in order to talk to her and tell her she did not have to talk to the police.
|
|||||
| State v. Evenson, 1 CA-CR 00-0621,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT E, October 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where publisher of adult magazine was convicted of displaying, selling or offering to sell from vending machine material harmful to minors, statute covering that offense was constitutional and did not violate equal protection and due process.
|
|||||
| State v. Garcia Bail Bonds, 1 CA-CV 00-0393,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT D, October 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The fact that a criminal defendant had been permitted to return to Colorado and surrender on an unrelated charge was reasonable cause excusing the defendant's non-appearance in Arizona, and the appearance bond should have been exonerated.
|
|||||
| State v. Nichols, 2 CA-SA 01-0062,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, October 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A serious drug offense sentence enhancement statute was found to be constitutional and the facts used for the enhancement did not need be alleged in the charging document provided correct notice of them was given to defendant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
