|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - November 5 - November 8, 2001
|
| |
|
| |
In re Avila, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0164-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 5, 2001, Decided , November 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An attorney who knowingly violated his duty to his clients, the public, the legal system, and caused actual or potential injury to his clients was suspended from the practice of law for three-years, along with other sanctions.
|
|
| |
In re Nielsen, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0154-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 5, 2001, Decided , November 5, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: An attorney was disbarred where, inter alia, he received $ 5,817 to represent a client in a bankruptcy matter. After the case was dismissed, he told the clients he would re-file, but did not.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re An Inactive, Supreme Court No. SB-01-0161-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 7, 2001, Decided , November 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Lawyer, an inactive member of the Arizona State Bar, was suspended from the practice of law for four months and placed on probation for two years for conduct in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer.
|
|
| |
In re Benton, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0156-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 7, 2001, Decided , November 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was suspended for three years, plus given two years of probation, for failure to be diligent, to communicate, to properly maintain client property, to terminate properly, to supervise an employee, and to respond to bar inquiries.
|
|
| |
In re Sorenson, Arizona Supreme Court No. SB-01-0165-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 7, 2001, Decided , November 7, 2001, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where attorney initially took retainers and sometimes performed work, but then discontinued services for his clients, did not communicate with them, did not file pleadings, and failed to appear in court, three year suspension was appropriate.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
