 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Giles, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0116-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 1, 2002, Decided , November 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 120 days and placed on probation for 2 years, where, inter alia, he admitted he failed to act with diligence and promptness in his representation of his clients in collection matters and kept his accounts poorly.
|
|||||
| In re Hart, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0119-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 1, 2002, Decided , November 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney was subject to a two-year suspension for mishandling client funds, neglecting legal matters, and inter alia failure to timely disclose the identity of his expert witness.
|
|||||
| State v. Hernandez, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-02-0067-PR.,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 4, 2002, Decided , November 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Ring, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-97-0428-AP, et al,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Facilitec, Inc. v. Hibbs, 1 CA-CV 01-0139,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT T, November 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Partial summary judgment in favor of the contract bidder was reversed and remanded, where statute authorized the Director of the Arizona Department of Administration to delegate to the deputy director the decision-making duty in question.
|
|||||
| Health for Life Brands, Inc. v. Powley, 1 CA-CV 01-0242,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, November 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a breach of contract case that was removed from superior court to federal district court, transferred to bankruptcy court, and then remanded back to superior court, superior court regained jurisdiction upon entry of the remand order.
|
|||||
| Cherry v. Araneta, 1 CA-SA 02-0164,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT B, November 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court could determine as a matter of law whether petitioner had a prior conviction for a violent crime by looking to the statutory definition of the offense; as such, the issue was not required to be submitted to a jury.
|
|||||
| State v. Patterson, 1 CA-CR 01-0392,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, November 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion in reopening a case and admitting a map into evidence in response to a jury question during deliberations. The map would have been admissible if it had been offered, and neither party was prejudiced thereby.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
