 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Estate of McGill v. Albrecht, Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-02-0058-PR,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decedent's estate and children might have had a claim against psychiatrist, physician, and health care provider under an adult protective care statute when decedent died of cancer complications while in the care of a mental health facility.
|
|||||
| State v. Moore, 1 CA-CR 01-0909 RT,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION ONE, DEPARTMENT C, November 12, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's confrontation rights were violated when telephonic testimony was admitted in a criminal trial and the State had not demonstrated a compelling reason or need for the telephonic testimony to have substituted for in-person testimony.
|
|||||
| In re Non-Member of the State Bar of Ariz., Supreme Court No. SB-02-0145-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 14, 2002, Decided , November 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The attorney, as a nonmember of the State Bar of Arizona, was censured for conduct in violation of her duties and obligations as a lawyer and ordered to pay restitution.
|
|||||
| In re Randall, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0146-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 14, 2002, Decided , November 14, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where attorney was accused of minor trust account violations where no clients were harmed, and attorney left solo practice to work at a law firm where he would not need to maintain a trust account, censure of attorney was appropriate discipline.
|
|||||
| In re Villegas, Supreme Court No. JC-02-0002,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, November 18, 2002, Decided , November 18, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where justice of peace's conduct violated the Code of Judicial Conduct and constituted conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, the supreme court publicly censured the justice.
|
|||||
| Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima County, 2 CA-CV 2001-0198,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, November 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute requiring owner's consent before rezoning was an unconstitutional delegation of authority. County properly rezoned the realty company's property, even though it did not have the express written consent of the realty company.
|
|||||
| State v. Morgan, 2 CA-CR 2000-0216, 2 CA-CR 2001-0300-PR (Consolidated),
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA, DIVISION TWO, DEPARTMENT A, November 19, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State presented sufficient evidence of child molestation, even without defendant's confession. The trial court did not err in refusing lesser-included offense instructions, and trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
