|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Arizona - December 5 - December 6, 2002
|
| |
|
| |
In re Bolding, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0134-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 5, 2002, Decided , December 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where attorney diverted money, which was provided by client's parents, to client while she was drug addicted, on probation, subject to random drug screening, and facing prison sentence, one-year suspension was appropriate discipline.
|
|
| |
In re Byrd, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0132-D,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 5, 2002, Decided , December 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although attorney committed several ethical violations, including failure to communicate with clients while suffering from alcoholism and drug addiction, attorney sought treatment, and an 18 month suspension was the appropriate discipline.
|
|
| |
In re Keith, Supreme Court No. SB-02-0133-RD,
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA, December 5, 2002, Decided , December 5, 2002, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where attorney was suspended and placed on probation in California, a 90 day suspension, the successful completion of probation in California, plus payment of costs was the appropriate reciprocal discipline in Arizona.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
