 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| AJ&K Operating Co. v. Smith, 03-232,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 8, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A finding against the oil companies was improper where the circuit court abused its discretion in concluding that there was irreparable harm to the landowners and in refusing to modify the temporary restraining order.
|
|||||
| Cherry v. State, CA CR 02-226,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence of defendant manufacturing methamphetamine as a jury could conclude that he possessed items for the purpose of manufacturing. Gun next to items used to manufacture drugs was under defendant's dominion and control.
|
|||||
| Gillespie v. State, CACR02-446,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was without merit and counsel was allowed to withdraw, as testimony of victim constituted substantial evidence that defendant raped her, and issue of whether denial of motion for reconsideration was erroneous was not preserved for review.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, CACR02-474,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kissire v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., CA02-40,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because of the trial judge's failure to determine the cross-claim of the phone company against the construction company, the appeal was dismissed for lack of a final order.
|
|||||
| Krumrey v. Still, CA02-542,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mother had legitimate reasons for relocation to Kansas City, Missouri, for a teaching job, which violated the trial court's orders concerning distance and the move did not present a material change of circumstances meriting a change of child custody.
|
|||||
| Smith v. State, CACR02-228,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for two counts of rape was proper, where the victims testified that defendant committed the acts, and the cases should not have been severed, as each victim's testimony would be admissible in the trial of the other.
|
|||||
| Tillery v. State, CACR 02-285,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant violated the terms of his probation by being convicted of possession of a controlled substance, defendant's appeal of his probation revocation was without merit and counsel's motion to withdraw was granted.
|
|||||
| Tillery v. State, CACR 01-879,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 8, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's 12-year prison term was within the legislative limits, defendant's argument that the sentence was too harsh was rejected.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
