 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brown v. State, No. CR06-737,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claim of insufficient evidence was not preserved for appeal, and appellate court could not decide whether calendar contained work product as defendant did not make it part of the record. Defendant was not denied right to full, fair, and public trial and failed to preserve his arguments of a denial of right to defense and prosecutorial misconduct.
|
|||||
| Davis v. State, No. CR 06-766,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's kidnapping conviction, under Ark. Code Ann. § 5-11-102, because facts showed defendant carried victim off with obvious purpose of causing injury or terrorizing. In attempted burglary case, defendant kicked victim's door and attempted entry. Finally, evidence was sufficient to revoke probation.
|
|||||
| Hooten v. Cottrell, No. 06-1167,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's motion to file his mandamus action seeking writ to compel circuit judge to hold hearing on his breach of contract complaint without paying the filing fee because he made no showing that fundamental right was involved in civil matter and advanced no basis for granting his motion to file mandamus petition without paying fee.
|
|||||
| Latiolais v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., No. 06-1297,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court granted mother's motion for belated appeal from lower court's dismissal of her appeal from order terminating her parental rights due to mother's failure to file brief because it was clear that brief was not filed due to errors on part of her counsel.
|
|||||
| Love v. State, No. CR 06-1236,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where petitioner did not receive a timely copy of the order dismissing his petition for postconviction relief, the circuit clerk did not act in accordance with Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.3(d). Petitioner was entitled to bring a belated appeal.
|
|||||
| Murry v. Humphrey, No. CR 06-1359,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, No. CR 98-1167,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's request for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to reinvest the trial court with jurisdiction to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis was denied because he failed to provide facts that supported his claim of collusion between the prosecution and the officers; he did not state facts to support his allegations.
|
|||||
| Sevier v. State, No. CR 06-1404,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the motion for rule on clerk indicated that defendant's attorney was responsible for the failure to file the record on appeal within the time set forth in Ark. R. App. P. Civ. 5(a), the motion was granted.
|
|||||
| Sims v. State, No. CR 06-1389,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 4, 2007, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant's attorney stated that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part, the state supreme court granted his motion for rule on clerk.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
