 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Nimmer v. State, CACR03-576,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court of appeals reversed the order of the circuit court modifying defendant's suspended sentence and imposing a new sentence of imprisonment; the circuit court did not have the authority to modify defendant's sentence.
|
|||||
| Phillips v. State, CACR03-387,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, January 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant hit his girlfriend several times, causing her to suffer facial hematomas, a broken nose, closed head trauma, and a large amount of facial swelling, there was ample evidence to convict defendant of second-degree domestic battering.
|
|||||
| SLC, Inc. v. Nat'l Bank of Ark., CA 03-358,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a foreclosure order was not effective until filed, it was within the authority of a trial court to enter a written order conforming to the proof, irrespective of whether the provisions contained in the order had been announced from the bench.
|
|||||
| Simmons v. State, CA02-759,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where two store clerks testified that appellant juvenile shoplifted cigarettes, the evidence was sufficient to support his adjudication as a delinquent.
|
|||||
| Washington v. State, CACR03-350,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant used a firearm as a club to hit two victims, his conduct did not come within the meaning of the first-degree battery statute; the statute was not intended to include an injury caused by a firearm's use as a club.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, CACR03-70,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial judge did not abuse his discretion in assessing a 25-year sentence for defendant's conviction of delivery of a controlled substance (.209 grams of crack cocaine), as it was a mid-range sentence for the Class Y felony offense.
|
|||||
| Zachary v. State, CACR03-260,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, January 7, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was error to convict defendant of possession of controlled substance with intent to deliver, where possession of .0993 grams of methamphetamine and $ 1,677 in cash was not sufficient evidence that he was in possession with intent to deliver.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
