 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Stokes v. Delta Prod. Credit Ass'n, CA 01-587,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, January 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Credit association met conditions to require debtor on promissory note balances arising out of crop loan to repay where it properly sold assets, paragraphs of memorandum were independent, and debtor was not guarantor.
|
|||||
| Terry v. State, CACR 01-300,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err denying motion for new trial as testimony from potential witness would not have changed outcome of trial. Prosecutor should have disclosed all witness's criminal convictions, but testimony was credible and corroborated.
|
|||||
| Tubbs v. State, CACR01-855,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly revoked defendant's suspended sentence probation for failure to pay restitution where his excuses were that he gave the money to his girlfriend who failed to remit the funds and he used the money to pay numerous court fines.
|
|||||
| Whitney v. State, CACR00-327,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, January 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defense counsel was permitted to withdraw as appeal was frivolous, and revocation of probation was upheld where preponderance of evidence supported finding that defendant violated single term of probation.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, CACR 00-429,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, January 9, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for murder. Trial court's ruling on motion to suppress photographic identification was proper. Also, trial court properly refused to allow counsel to read statement, as it was hearsay.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
