Arkansas, February, 2002, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - Arkansas - February 14, 2002

Anderson v. Cass, 01-430, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Where defendant brought a petition for writ of mandamus alleging illegal sentence, court properly denied relief, as the defendant brought a prior petition with the same issue that was denied.

Search Cases for Free

Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. T.B., 01-654, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Department was obligated to pay for juvenile's out-of-state sex offender treatment as no in-state facility was available. Department could not refuse to pay for services because it was the department's duty to document the determinations.

Search Cases for Free

Bryant v. State, CR 00-1255, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Campbell v. State, CR 01-1181, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Cherry v. State, CR 01-858, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Court did not err in denying defendant's motion for continuance to procure expert testimony, where defendant waited until two days before trial when he had had five months in which to obtain an expert.

Search Cases for Free

Christopher v. State, CR 01-445, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Dansby v. State, CR 00-1363, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Defense counsel was not ineffective for allowing defendant to testify, where he was questioned about confession to wife, and had he not testified, his wife would not have been called to rebut his testimony.

Search Cases for Free

In re Appointment of Special Consultant, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Search Cases for Free

Jones Rigging & Heavy Hauling v. Parker, 01-770, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Court erred in granting new trial to plaintiffs on basis of surprise, where they did not show that they were prejudiced by the testimony of a witness they called, and where they did not object to the testimony, or request curative instruction.

Search Cases for Free

King v. State, CR 01-315, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, February 14, 2002, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Supreme court declined to consider defendant's appeal, as he failed to abstract the trial record, as required by rule.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal