 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Atkinson v. State, CR 01-097,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Murder defendant's expressed desire for victim's death and encouragement of killer supported conviction. Second-degree murder instruction lacked rational basis; trial court's communication with jury by note did not require reversal.
|
|||||
| Brown v. State, CR 01-1196,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal defendant was given additional time to file an appellate brief for good cause shown where his attorney admitted that he had notice of the brief's due date, and accepted full responsibility for failing to timely file the brief.
|
|||||
| Dulaney v. State, CR 00-1150,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure to seek directed verdict did not prejudice defendant, as motion would have been denied, given evidence. Defendant's simultaneous drugs and firearms possession was shown; issues trial court did not rule on were not considered.
|
|||||
| Edwards v. State, CR 00-1452,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statute amended to allow trial court discretion in waiving a rule that a defendant serve 70 percent of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole could not be applied retroactively in absence of legislative intent to make it retroactive.
|
|||||
| Fulton v. Norris, 00-1188,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of mandamus for reduction of sentence to sentencing commission's presumptive sentence time was upheld. Defendant changed his claim from departure report absence to upward departure being inappropriate; issue was not preserved.
|
|||||
| Hilderbrand v. State, CR 01-1130,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant seeking postconviction relief was not entitled to free transcript of probation revocation proceeding as defendant had not showed compelling need for documents to support petition for relief.
|
|||||
| Jones v. State, CR 01-1244,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Neglecting to timely file record on appeal or to state good cause for the failure to comply with proper appellate procedure resulted in defendant's motion to file record belatedly being denied.
|
|||||
| Norton v. State, CR 00-1003,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pennington v. State, CR 01-1352,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, January 10, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
